Comparative Evaluation of Push out Bond Strength of Bulk Fill versus Dual Cure Resin Composites in Root Canals


Creative Commons License

DUMANİ A., YILMAZ A. Ş. , ÖZBİLEN G. , Gürbüz C. C. , YOLDAŞ H. O.

JOURNAL OF ORAL HEALTH AND DENTAL MANAGEMENT, cilt.15, ss.1-6, 2016 (Diğer Kurumların Hakemli Dergileri)

  • Cilt numarası: 15 Konu: 6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2016
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ORAL HEALTH AND DENTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-6

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study to evaluate the bond strength of bulk-fill and dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin at

coronal, middle and apical levels. Materials and Methods: Forty four extracted single-rooted teeth were removed 12 mm from the

apex and a root canal treatment was performed. The post spaces were prepared to a depth of 8 mm using a Cytec Blanco pilot bur.

Then, the roots were randomly divided into four groups according to the restoration protocols: Fiber post + Panavia F, Clearfil DC

Bond + Bulkfill composite (SonicFill), Clearfil DC Bond + Bulkfill composite (Clearfil PhotoCore), and Clearfil DC Bond + Dualcure

composite (Clearfil DC CorePlus). For the push-out test, the roots were embedded in acrylic and sectioned using a watercooled

diamond coated saw. Three slices (coronal, middle, and apical) were obtained from each root. Results: The SonicFill group

had the lowest push-out bond strength values, while the Fiber post + Panavia F group had the highest median MPa levels for the

coronal, middle, and apical levels (p<0.001). In all groups, the apical third section had a lower push-out bond strength compared

with the middle and coronal levels. Conclusion: The bond strength of a sonic activated bulk-fill composite in root canals is lower

than that of other conventional methods.