Influence of Section Geometry and Material Selection on Energy Absorption in Crash Boxes: A Finite Element Approach


Creative Commons License

Kumlu U., Hükümdar Ö., Gök Y., Akar M. A., Keskin A.

5th INTERNATIONAL PARIS CONGRESS ON APPLIED SCIENCES, Paris, Fransa, 4 - 08 Ağustos 2025, ss.21-37, (Tam Metin Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Tam Metin Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Paris
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Fransa
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.21-37
  • Çukurova Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Nowadays, in order to increase structural safety in the automotive industry, studies to improve

the impact energy absorption capacity of thin-walled structures have gained great momentum.

In parallel with this, studies in this field aim to improve the energy absorption performance by

optimizing the geometrical properties of structural elements used in crash boxes. In this study,

the crushing behaviour and energy absorption capabilities of thin-walled structures with various

cross-section geometries under axial impact loading are investigated numerically. Three

different configurations are modelled to determine the contribution of cross-section and

material types in the impact absorption of thin-walled structures. Simulations were carried out

using the finite element method (FEM) dynamic collision scenario. The crash scenarios for each

configuration were analyzed under identical conditions using two different materials (DP-600

and AL6061-T6) and constant thickness (1 mm). Dynamic crash simulations were compared

with respect to Specific Energy Absorption (SEA), Total Energy (EA), Peak Crushing Force

(PCF), and Mean Crushing Force (MCF) values to investigate the effects of material types and

the crushing behaviour of crash boxes on geometric cross-sections. According to the data

obtained in the study, the highest SEA value was found to be 33.89 kJ/kg in the AL-S2

combination, while the highest CLE value of 0.428 was found in the AL-S2 combination. When

compared in square models, the AL-S2 combination had 2.61 times higher result than the ALS

combination in terms of SEA value. When evaluated in terms of CLE value, the AL-S2

combination had 2.39 times higher results compared to the AL-S combination. When the

research results were evaluated, flower-section combinations stood out compared to squaresection

combinations in terms of both SEA and CLE values. The results of the analyses showed

that cross-section configurations and material types play a positive role in the crashworthiness

characteristics of thin-walled structures.