Balance diagnostics in propensity score analysis following multiple imputation: A new method

Yucel Karakaya S. P., ÜNAL İ.

PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, cilt.23, sa.5, ss.763-777, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 23 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/pst.2389
  • Dergi Adı: PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.763-777
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: balance, missing data, multiple imputation, observational studies, propensity score analysis
  • Çukurova Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The combination of propensity score analysis and multiple imputation has been prominent in epidemiological research in recent years. However, studies on the evaluation of balance in this combination are limited. In this paper, we propose a new method for assessing balance in propensity score analysis following multiple imputation. A simulation study was conducted to evaluate the performance of balance assessment methods (Leyrat's, Leite's, and new method). Simulated scenarios varied regarding the presence of missing data in the control or treatment and control group, and the imputation model with/without outcome. Leyrat's method was more biased in all the studied scenarios. Leite's method and the combine method yielded balanced results with lower mean absolute difference, regardless of whether the outcome was included in the imputation model or not. Leyrat's method had a higher false positive ratio and Leite's and combine method had higher specificity and accuracy, especially when the outcome was not included in the imputation model. According to simulation results, most of time, Leyrat's method and Leite's method contradict with each other on appraising the balance. This discrepancy can be solved using new combine method.