Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
journal of language and linguistic studies, cilt.16, sa.2, ss.1019-1031, 2020 (Scopus)
This documentary study analyses the levels of reflection in the reflective journals written by 59 ELT student
teachers from a Turkish university upon their experiences at practice schools. During the practicum, each student
teacher wrote four reflective journals on pre-determined topics for observation. The foci of journals were on the
lesson observed, the mentor’s classroom management strategies, classroom context and language, blackboard use
and error correction. In this study, the journals were analyzed on the basis of Hattan and Smith’s (1995) reflective
writing styles and categorized under reflective models by Taggart and Wilson (2005). The analysis reveals that
student teachers used a descriptive tone in writing their journals rather than a reflective one. The majority of the
reflective statements used were in technical level followed by contextual level. In the journals, as compared to
descriptions and reflections in technical and contextual levels, we detect rarer reflections in dialectical level. To
shed more light to the study, interviews were held with eleven student teachers selected by convenience sampling
method and the results of the analysis were discussed. Not being familiar with the word reflection, time constraint,
lack of motivation, the nature of tasks and finally, distrust in the probability of supervisors’ reading the journals
were the reasons why the student teachers did not much care about how they wrote the journals.