P Wave Peak Time for Predicting an Increased Left Atrial Volume Index in Hemodialysis Patients.


Yıldız İ., Özmen Y., Burak C., Rencüzoğulları İ., Karaveli G., Kaya B., ...Daha Fazla

Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, cilt.29, ss.262-269, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 29
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1159/000503709
  • Dergi Adı: Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.262-269
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Electrocardiography, Hemodialysis, Left atrial volume index, P wave peak time, OF-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHYS GUIDELINES, AMERICAN-SOCIETY, CHAMBER QUANTIFICATION, DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION, EUROPEAN-ASSOCIATION, STANDARDS COMMITTEE, RECOMMENDATIONS, MORTALITY, FORCE, DISPERSION
  • Çukurova Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: An increased left atrial volume index (LAVI) is related to increased mortality in hemodialysis patients. In the present study, we evaluated the association between the LAVI and the P wave peak time (PWPT), a newly introduced electrocardiographic parameter, in hemodialysis patients. Methods: The study population was made up of 79 hemodialysis patients with a mean age of 53 +/- 18 years (55.7% were males). These patients were divided into a normal LAVI (<= 28 mL/m(2)) group (n = 45) and an increased LAVI (>28 mL/m(2)) group (n = 34). The demographic, clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic variables of the groups were compared. Results: The P wave terminal force from lead V1, P wave dispersion and PWPTs obtained from leads V1 and D2 (PWPTD2) were significantly higher in the patients with increased LAVIs. In multivariable analysis, only the PWPTD2was an independent predictor of an increased LAVI (odds ratio = 1.117, 95% CI = 1.052-1.185, p < 0.001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the best PWPTD2 cutoff value for predicting an increased LAVI was 60 ms, with a sensitivity of 76.5% and a specificity of 66.7% (area under the curve = 0.736, 95% CI = 0.625-0.829, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that a prolonged PWPTD2 was independently associated with an increased LAVI in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, measuring the PWPTD2 duration on an electrocardiogram may help define high-risk hemodialysis patients with increased LAVIs.